Ord TalkAll the News and Commentary in Ord you won't find Anywhere Else |
||
Links
Forgotten your password?
|
The Markowski Affair: CommentsShakes Shakes said, "...but instead of cutting someone off from their livelihood (and possible putting them on unemployment or some other government aid)..." Did anyone notice the BIG asprin bottle in front of the mayor on the table, along with a bottled water to wash them down with? Looks like he was well prepared for a Markowski induced headache. rock - are you sure that aspirin wasn't because of you? Again, with the good neighbors thing, the ONLY situation I was talking about was helping find the dogs. We're talking about two different things. I'm talking about being a good neighbor to someone and you are trying to justify being a bad neighbor by saying he deserves it. Wow, makes it sound an awful lot like you can't bring yourself to be the bigger person and just say, "yeah, he probably could've helped." Funny how shakes tries to take the high road after he gets his foot in his mouth. Funny how shakes wants to keep diverting attention from the Markowski Affair. What's up with that? Only within the boundaries of shake's mind could one find that I said,..."you are trying to justify being a bad neighbor by saying he deserves it." (Quote by shakes) In the light of reality, where most of us live...I never said any such thing. Shakes Low life...Low life...? You arrogant a@@ PMS. While your driving around in your Mercedes collecting your slum lord rent, why don't you stop by Edna Whitmores to reimburse her the money she paid to get her trees out of the power lines & her sidewalk. Rock, rock - To put this as clearly as possible: I agree with you that something needs done on this, however, I don't think he needs to be fired to accomplish change. There, I'm done with the Markowskie deal. 05 alum, Please go back and listen to the tape again. I believe you will find your answers. What Markowski said was the branch was 12 to 18 in. tree limb (holding his hands up in a circle), 20 to 25 feet in the air. This is the branch towards his house that Markowski talks about cutting back to the tree (that if it had broken it could have hit his house). This is the 3rd tree from the NORTH as described by Markowski. The power line runs between the 1st and 2nd trees. Take a look at the 1103 G Street property and the 1105 G Street property, like the mayor did and I am sure you will come up with the same statement as he said to me the tree trimming did not involve any power lines, just a telephone line. The mayor added the city has nothing to do with the telephone lines. The tree trimming for 1105 G Street (Edghill) was done 1 year before at Mr. Edghill's request Markowski stated. Finding City of Ord on the trucks is a moot point, since Markowski admitted he sent the crews down there after picking up dead limbs on a Saturday. Markowski attempted to cloud the tree trimming of his property this year by saying he was requested by Mr. Edghill to trim the trees from the power lines (which both the request, and Mr. Edghill's job was perfomed last year, NOT this year). There is no evidence to support Markowski's claim. Whoever the utilities superintendent was calling a low life, Chief of Police or the new owner of the M Street property; this is an unprofessional way to act, and was prompted by Markowski having to pay $200 for this garage shed (that he removed from the property) or the police investigation. When did this incident occur, I don't know. More importantly, what equipment was used to move the building? The Bohemuth School Tour Bus came down Q (not O) Street yesterday afternoon about 3:30 - 4:00 o'clock hitting the overhanging trees between 10th & 11th. When sufficient damage occurs to the mega bucks bus, what tax payers money will be used to repair or replace the bus? School district money or the city's? As I have previously asked if Superintendent Markowski is done trimming the trees at his rental income producing property, could the mayor and the city council consider directing Superintendent Markowski to trim the overhanging trees on Q Street (not O) between 10th & 11th and between Q (not O) and P Streets. and tincan thought that everything was quiet on the western front... This is a response to a question that was asked on the viral vent page and a continuation of a previously asked question on this page. Isn't it time for an audit of the city books by the attorney general or the state auditor to check out how the rest of our money is being spent? Why is the clerk making special phone calls to private land owners about who's looking for properties, rather than selling city property. I think this cronyism goes deeper then anyone thinks. On this very special day, I wish all mothers a very happy Mother's Day. sweetpea - Tuesday, May 11 2010 at 3:07pm I had the opportunity to view the video (Another Perspective) of the Markowski Affair. It is absolutely hilarious. Those with a sense of humor will find watching this parody, laughing to the point that tears will roll down your face as it did me. I would encourage everyone to take a few minutes and request your own copy. It's to funny for you to be left out of laughing at this persective of the Markowski Affair. Seems that even though they think they can say whatever they want, however they want, even OrdTalk is subject to copyright infringement. Too bad, I'm sure comparing situations in this town to a video of NAZIS AND HITLER is just so hilarious! Wish I could laugh about one of the largest genocides in history, using it to parody a small town squabble. Very classy OrdTalk! 1 2
To comment you must be logged in. All comments are property of their respective authors. Ord Talk in no way assumes responsibility for or endorsement of information supplied by third-party users of this site. We reserve the right to delete or edit any comment at our discretion. |
|
|
© 2009 - Ord Talk - All Rights Reserved |
||
Sting - as far as the name calling, QUIT BEING A HYPOCRITE!!! How many times in the past have you called someone degrading names? (when everyone knew who you were talking about or you named them) As far as my name-calling in this case, I admitted that was wrong of me and apologized. If Schafer reads this, then he sees I apologized for it, if not then he wouldn't have known about it in the first place.
As far as your comment about implementing change: DUH! I just said twice now to make Markowski pay for everything and publicly reprimand him and he should by then realize he can't get away with any more. The only thing I'm disagreeing with you is that I don't think he needs to be fired just for a few people in town to prove a point.
Other than saying that on two previous occasions, I haven't commented anything about Markowski. Maybe this is where you are confused. The whole thing about saying Schafer maybe should've helped instead of videotaping has nothing to do with the right/wrong in the Markowski deal. All I'm saying is there are a bunch of hypocrites on here that want to talk about being good to your neighbor, but won't actually help their neighbor in a time of need, like when one's dogs are missing.
I'm sure you'll keep reading way too far into it, so here's a summary:
1.) Punish Markowski, but don't fire him, and move on with this ordeal in the back of the council's minds.
2.) Instead of TALKING about being good to your neighbor, actually HELP your neighbor when they need it instead of standing there with a camera.
You keep acting like I'm dismissing Markowski from being punished, but I'm not. I just didn't have much else to add to the conversation as far as how wrong he was, so I didn't, but did move on to another topic addressing a different person.