Ord TalkAll the News and Commentary in Ord you won't find Anywhere Else |
||
Links
Forgotten your password?
|
The Viral Vent: CommentsHappy New Year, Lawman. Yes, Lawman there are officers that have knowledge of what’s going on. Some have left the Ord P.D. as their integrity would not permit themselves to be a part of that mess. You know the drill “Do not speak ill of fellow officers.” These officers also (as irish one has) have to consider their future and careers. Folks are now getting a better picture of what I call the “umbrella of protection.” THERE WILL BE A PETITION FOR AN INIATIVE... to be placed on the November ballot for the citizens of the City of Ord to vote on retaining the present Ord P.D. or require the City of Ord to contract with Valley County Sheriff’s Dept. to provide law enforcement within the City of Ord, as soon as I get all papers from the lawyers back this process will begin. I would appreciate very much any opinion or advice you would have. If I read the law correctly all that is needed is 230 signatures of registered voters to put this on the ballot. The city council is confronting a $250,000 deficit. The options to cover the $250,000 deficit are (1)steal (using Butch Koelmoos’s words) the funds from sales tax, (2)raise real estate taxes to the tune of $322 per $100,000 evaluation or (3)use the funds from Keno gambling if it passes (as Butch Koelmoos stated you can’t count on that). Option 1 - In order to use the sales tax funds, it would require a vote of the city council to utilize those funds, but would leave the city without any funds for emergencies. The Budget Committee is not recommending “stealing” the money from the sales tax. A few members on the city council are smart enough not to vote for this theft. Those council members in favor of “stealing” from the city have stolen from the city before for their own personal benefit, so this is nothing new to them. Option 2 – Raising real estate taxes to the tune of $322 per $100,000 evaluation is completely out of the question. Option 3 – The proposed Keno gambling will go down in flames. One other option would be to cut city services, which Adam Miller himself said he would rather see consolidation (Valley County Sheriff’s Dept. providing law enforcement for the City of Ord.) Clearly there shouldn’t be any question in anybody’s mind as to the future of Ord P.D. The present stagnation of the city council is being held up by a few that are desperately trying to maintain their control and personal use of Ord P.D., such as we have seen with the retaliatory trespassing citation of a fisherman who has previously exposed the same city council members as thieves. To move the present stalemate that the city council finds itself in an initiative to put the matter on the ballot requiring the City of Ord to contract with Valley County for law enforcement services within the city is a measure that would take this matter out of the hands of the special interest (i.e. saloon lobbying delegation and thieves on the city council). This would only require 230 signatures of registered voters to put on the ballot. HAPPY NEW YEAR! Rock and Lawman, Tincan, Ord isn't a bad place as you suggest-as far as the doctors are concern I disagree with you-Ord still has good doctors in practice. I would like you to prove to me where the hospital board was corrupt-I will agree that changes needed to be made in personnal and those changes are now in place. jab_gone sorry about my spelling, Mrs. Tolen tried to get me to spell better, it is my fault, not hers!!! The initiative idea is sheer genius. The initiative process can be used to require the county board of supervisors to sell the hospital. Take the issues out of the politicians’ hands & put it into the voters’ hands. The initiative process is a measure which the voters can express their requirements on particular issues. I am sure there will be considerable opposition and attacks on the initiative concerning the Ord Police Department, considering those in favor of retaining it would lose their favored status. Rock, Irish one...............from the people that I have contacted, the trespassing case is in the court system, so it will have to play out there. Could take a long time...... Lawman, Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Rock, Tin can, thanks for the vote of confidence. I too was outraged at the blatant, malicious INTENTIONAL steps that were taken by Mayor Roger Goldfish and being pushed by Council Member Dan Petska to deny individuals their constitutional rights formulated and contrived by Chief Adam Miller. The documents are clear and unambiguous to their intent. I was present at the city council meeting when the city council voted to hire a special prosecutor to prosecute these two fishermen. City Attorney, Greg Jensen asked the question, “What is it the council is voting on?” None of the council members were responding to his question, so I spoke up and said, “Greg, you were not at the August 12th special meeting of the city council. Where the council voted to prosecute these two fishermen on the ordinance side of the law effectively denying them their constitutional rights to a jury trial and appointed counsel.” Greg Jensen responded, “Oh yeah, I do remember reading that.” Council Member Dan Petska then chimed in and said we need to move on. At which point, Mayor Goldfish quickly asked for a motion. It needs to be pointed out that City Attorney Greg Jensen does not prosecute city ordinances on behalf of the city. This is the reason Mayor Goldfish and Council Member Petska had to push to hire a “special prosecutor.” One notable point needs to be made here; the city council at this same time was dealing with how to address the $250,000 budget deficit and was considering contracting with the Valley County Sheriff’s Dept. for law enforcement within the city. One can clearly see that even though the city council was facing the $250,000 budget deficit; they were more than willing to spend the money on a special prosecutor to have a father and son prosecuted for the crime of attempting to catch a crappie on a city owned pond on a Saturday afternoon. The fact of the matter is attempting to catch a crappie is not the crime being prosecuted here, but in actuality is retaliation for exposing the thievery on camera of city services over many years. More on this story to come… People, this story is a very serious attack on your constitutional rights!!! It begins with the Markowski affair back in May 2010, then to Markowski 2.0, and to the video of another point of view from Hitler. Check out the archives on ordtalk. Ord 2:20 To comment you must be logged in. All comments are property of their respective authors. Ord Talk in no way assumes responsibility for or endorsement of information supplied by third-party users of this site. We reserve the right to delete or edit any comment at our discretion. |
|
|
© 2009 - Ord Talk - All Rights Reserved |
||
I don't know about now, as I have not been in that office for years, but, we had that problem years ago and installed a video camera, in order to catch the person responsible. I wonder if it is still there?
I also get the feeling that you are telling me that the Chief and the officers have this knowledge and do nothing?
I will visit with a few people, that may be able to help with this matter. I make no promises, but one never knows what will happen.