Forgotten your password?
Not yet registered? Register.

The Viral Vent: Comments

<<Back to article

crash - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 3:52pm

By the way, did anyone hear that Bond money may have gone to prop up operational income????

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 15 2010 at 11:08am

By the way, did anyone who frequents Ordtalk assist the residents of North Loup with the flooding that has taken place?

crash - Wednesday, June 16 2010 at 1:15pm

yep

rock - Friday, June 18 2010 at 7:19am

yep

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:17am

U.S. District Judge Rules in Favor of First Amendment
Protections Against Osceola County Sheriff Doug Weber’s Retaliatory Denial of Concealed Weapon Permit

Judge Mark Bennett also said, “If I had the legal authority I would order punitive damages be paid as well.”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 17, 2010 CONTACT: Vince Fahnlander, 612-341-1074
Sioux City, IA -In a stunning verdict from the bench yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Bennett announced that Osceola County, IA Sheriff Doug Weber’s denial of Paul Dorr’s concealed weapon permit in 2007 “Was the most egregious violation of the 1st Amendment he has witnessed in his 16 years serving on the bench.”
Paul Dorr and his son Alexander Dorr, of Ocheyedan, IA, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa in October 2008, against Sheriff Weber and Osceola County, Iowa, claiming violation of their 2nd Amendment rights. Sheriff Weber stated in sworn deposition testimony in November 2009 that he denied Paul Dorr’s conceal carry permit because of Paul Dorr’s speech and political activities in Osceola County. The Dorrs then amended their claim to include a violation of their 1st Amendment rights as well.
When asked at trial in federal court yesterday, “What changed from 2006 (when Sheriff Weber last granted Dorr’s permit) to 2007 (when Sheriff Weber denied Dorr’s permit), Sheriff Weber admitted, “He began writing letters and handing out brochures for the Osceola County Taxpayers Association.” These are all constitutionally protected activities.
Under cross-examination by Dorr’s attorneys, Sheriff Weber could not produce evidence to support his denial of Paul Dorr’s permit. Neither could the defendant’s only other witness, Dan DeKoter.
Judge Bennett announced that he hadn’t passed judgment from the bench before, always taking it under consideration and issuing a written judgment later. But in Paul Dorr’s case he ruled for the first time, from the bench, on behalf of Dorr.
To minimize any harm to the Osceola County taxpayers, Dorr waived any claim for compensatory or punitive damages prior to the trial. In his ruling, Judge Bennett also announced, “If I had the legal authority I would order punitive damages be paid as well.”

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:18am

Judge Bennett also announced that if the law permits he may order Sheriff Weber to a take a remedial class in the 1st Amendment.
Attorney Vince Fahnlander stated, “The judgment reinforces that the First Amendment will protect those voices that speak out against the government, and will not tolerate retaliation for speaking out on opinions against governmental authority.”
The Dorrs were represented by attorneys Bill Mohrman and Vince Fahnlander of the Minneapolis law firm Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A.
-30¬
4100 City Center, 33 S. 6th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402 | 612.341.1074 | support@mklaw.com

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:28am

File charges against Paul Markowski! File charges against the Mayor! City employees, wake up, they are stealing directly from you. What is wrong with your city attorney...... oh yes, he is a part of this also. Remember that. Report this gross negligence when it happens, but skip the local chain-of-command, they are almost all involved. Go larger and do your civic duty. It is time the "haves" and not the "have not's" sacrifice.

hunter4766 - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 12:27pm

We do not have the benefit of a judge Bennett.

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 29 2010 at 1:41pm

Another good website/article that speaks to Government handouts and waste...The site is sorted on Valley County...Enjoy!!!!

top_recips.php

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 29 2010 at 1:42pm

Forgot the link for the last 15 years.... Welcome to the Million Dollar Club!

top_recips.php

rock - Sunday, July 4 2010 at 10:15am

The city of Ord property owners have or will be receiving a letter prompted by the Ord Rural Fire District. The letter is self-explanatory as to how a $21,500 short fall has come about to the fire district. It is my understanding the short fall will be for one tax year, presuming the oversight will be corrected in subsequent tax years. I would encourage, as the letter suggests that we, the city of Ord property owners voluntarily pay what would have and should have been added to our tax statements. The cost is very minimal on a yearly basis, considering the service the volunteers provide to us. It is priceless. Additionally, donations to the Ord Rural Fire Department directly would help tremendously.

Have a happy and safe 4th of July.

hunter4766 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 11:18am

The letter in question indicates that a roll will be kept of those citizens who happily contribute additional monies to the tax man, and that this roll will be distributed. I am concerned about this invasion of privacy. If I would hiccup, like Rock, and cough up extra tax money to fill the coffers of these insane money grabbing power throttling small town gangsters, I would be signing up for the 'easy mark' list. don't tell me that the city can't cut $20 g from its budget.

newbie34 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 2:02pm

I'm with Rock on this one. It takes guts to admit you made a mistake, and even bigger guts to ask for help. I certainly don't want the fire department to run out of funds on their way to fight a fire at my house.

On another note, does your head get sweaty inside your foil hat, hunter?

hunter4766 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 4:42pm

It takes no guts to ask for more money than you need.
And when one asks for help when they have more than enough, that is chutzpah.
Did anyone ask Newbie if his feet get sweaty inside his jack boots?

sting - Monday, July 5 2010 at 7:39pm

The City of Ord doesn't have anything to do with the Ord Rural Fire Dept so certain self-serving persons on the city board can't steal your tax money or allow others to steal it too. You can rest comfortably knowing your money is going to be spent by ORFD honest volunteer people.

rock - Monday, July 5 2010 at 10:28pm

Hunter, Your point is well taken. However, I did not see the letter in the same light as you. I do not see the volunteers of the Ord Rural Fire District as the same as the insane money grabbing power throttling small town gangsters, that we have seen in the recent past. The volunteers of the Ord Rural Fire District are unselfishly serving their friends and neighbors...meaning us. The money goes for ongoing training, equipment, etc. for the volunteers to achieve their mission statement.

hunter4766 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 11:20pm

I am confused.
So the two million fire hall building has nothing to do with the fire district.
the city, county, whatever, stand there like the monopoly guy with turned out pockets.
Meanwhile, three different construction projects carry on in a parallel reality where money is snatched out of the distant future to pay the jig dancing bankers and bond men.
County supervisors meet fervently in hopes that the Great And Promised Genie To Be will suddenly appear and chase away the specter of the mysterious 25 year bond payout plan.
I'll bet the county paid more than twenty grand for the audit this month.

rock - Tuesday, July 6 2010 at 2:09am

hunter4766, not all taxes are bad, and not all that spend the tax money are thieves. The fire hall for the rural fire district is/was in my opinion a very worthwhile investment. However, I believe the Ord Dome (gym) was not. Upgrading the school to current safety standards...yes. The hospital...no, as I am sure we will shortly see how this one's going to play out. We will just have to agree to disagree on this one.

hunter4766 - Wednesday, July 7 2010 at 5:00pm

It was folly to build a 2 million dollar fire hall. A million should have been more than sufficient.
Which elected representative sat in on the sales talk?
Which elected representatives sat down among themselves and said, we should buy this, but not this, etc.
Why weren't the cops and fire hall combined into one building?
Undoubtedly a new police station is next.
The $20k accidental missed tax should be chalked up as a cost over run, a mere 1% of the total building cost, a mere .05% of the total tax slammed on the county in the past two years.
If the county has to beg for .05%, how are they paying for the 99.95%?

rock - Wednesday, July 7 2010 at 10:53pm

hunter4766, The Ord Rural Fire District is a completely separate entity, or body from the City of Ord. The City of Ord Police Department would not be and should not be part of the Ord Rural Fire District. The governing body for the City of Ord has nothing to say or do with how the Ord Rural Fire District functions (thank goodness). The governing body for the Ord Rural Fire District is elected within the volunteer organization with their funding permitted by statute by levies within the district. I have no doubt that if a person desires to express their concerns over the tax levies for the Ord Rural Fire District, the governing body for the district would be available and attentive to your concerns. The governing body for Valley County(County Board Members) has turned a deaf ear to the $21,500 shortfall and has in a few short words said this is the ORFD's problem. Even though the ORFD is the shortfall victim of someone else's omission.

To comment you must be logged in.

All comments are property of their respective authors. Ord Talk in no way assumes responsibility for or endorsement of information supplied by third-party users of this site. We reserve the right to delete or edit any comment at our discretion.