Forgotten your password?
Not yet registered? Register.

The Viral Vent: Comments

<<Back to article

rock - Tuesday, June 8 2010 at 11:59pm

Tincan, Sorry I did not get back with you a little sooner...I've been busy, busy, busy. I've been working on the latest of the PMS affair. I am waiting on a response from the owners of the buzzard roost. If they don't answer soon then I will have to post what I know.

Ordneb, Whatever you are doing to make yourself so moronic...it sure is working well for you. Irish one said it best. Here comes a new box of crayons for you, whiny pudd... The VHCS vision is on a downhill slide. The many CEO's over the past 8 years is a bad sign, to include massive turnover of supportive personnel and the lack of new medical personnel. I am saying sell the hospital before it gets on the tax rolls. If you don't think that the present bond is NOT a liability, reflecting massive debt of the county, just wait until it does hit the tax rolls. We will see if this was a good investment or not... Valley County budgets a sum total of $20,000 per annum...against how many millions in a bond???

crash - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 9:34am

Neboard,

The good ol boys running the VCHS told us the reason Docs were leaving was because of the Stevens.
They LIED. Higher turnover now than when Stevens were in the hospital.

They told us big profits were just around the corner.
LIED again. VCHS hasn't made enough money to make a fraction of the interest on the bond payment.

The only reason it isn't on the tax rolls allready is because the first two payments are comming out of the bond itself (wish I could get a loan like that, borrow enough money on a car to make the first two payments while I get the paperwork done).

They tell us the answer to the problems is Nancy, uh no Lowe, uh no Kanari, uh no Schrage, uh no (you fill in the blank),uh no not them either.
They LIED again, uh and again, uh and again, uh and again.

Mabe the answer to the problem is get rid of the good ol boys, sell the building to someone who has proven they can run a hospital (not into the ground) and get it out of local politics once and for all.

crash - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 9:42am

By the way, can you fill me in on the REAL reason Schrage was fired... oops I mean "resigned" ??????

ordneb - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 11:28am

Crash and Rock,

Thank you for staying on subject and your direct response to the question.

Thank you for offering intelligent solutions to the situation.

Thank you for the mature and civilized response.

With that, I think this topic is closed.

hunter4766 - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 1:41pm

The topic is closed with ordneb, but not with the entire county.
Ordneb can stick his head in the sand all he wants, where he can be mature, intelligent, and civilized.
Credit to Ordneb, he did not jump on my intentional spelling error. I underestimated him.

the hospital has not taken tax dollars over the past 20 years because there was no bond.
The hospital will soon take tax dollars to pay for the building.
The 25 year payout plan for the bond will give the answers.
Ordneb has closed the topic because he is caught.
If there is no 25 year payout plan, we are all in deep trouble.
If there is a 25 year pay out plan, why is it not public?
Which county supervisor has seen and studied the 25 year payout plan?
I am looking for ONE county supervisor to come forward with information.
ONE supervisor to say either:
YES - there is a plan
NO - I made a mistake. We should have asked for a 25 year plan.

ONE supervisor.

crash - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 3:44pm

Neboard,

You're welcome. The subject was VCHS Bond, missmanagement (Which I predict we will see more of),and solutions to the situation (unload the good ol boys and sell the mess)
Don't get upset because I won't go down your rabbit trail.

You're welcome for recognizing an intelligent solution when it's presented (and I almost gave up on your ability to see through the VCHS propaganda....silly me).

crash - Wednesday, June 9 2010 at 3:52pm

By the way, did anyone hear that Bond money may have gone to prop up operational income????

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 15 2010 at 11:08am

By the way, did anyone who frequents Ordtalk assist the residents of North Loup with the flooding that has taken place?

crash - Wednesday, June 16 2010 at 1:15pm

yep

rock - Friday, June 18 2010 at 7:19am

yep

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:17am

U.S. District Judge Rules in Favor of First Amendment
Protections Against Osceola County Sheriff Doug Weber’s Retaliatory Denial of Concealed Weapon Permit

Judge Mark Bennett also said, “If I had the legal authority I would order punitive damages be paid as well.”
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 17, 2010 CONTACT: Vince Fahnlander, 612-341-1074
Sioux City, IA -In a stunning verdict from the bench yesterday, U.S. District Court Judge Mark Bennett announced that Osceola County, IA Sheriff Doug Weber’s denial of Paul Dorr’s concealed weapon permit in 2007 “Was the most egregious violation of the 1st Amendment he has witnessed in his 16 years serving on the bench.”
Paul Dorr and his son Alexander Dorr, of Ocheyedan, IA, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa in October 2008, against Sheriff Weber and Osceola County, Iowa, claiming violation of their 2nd Amendment rights. Sheriff Weber stated in sworn deposition testimony in November 2009 that he denied Paul Dorr’s conceal carry permit because of Paul Dorr’s speech and political activities in Osceola County. The Dorrs then amended their claim to include a violation of their 1st Amendment rights as well.
When asked at trial in federal court yesterday, “What changed from 2006 (when Sheriff Weber last granted Dorr’s permit) to 2007 (when Sheriff Weber denied Dorr’s permit), Sheriff Weber admitted, “He began writing letters and handing out brochures for the Osceola County Taxpayers Association.” These are all constitutionally protected activities.
Under cross-examination by Dorr’s attorneys, Sheriff Weber could not produce evidence to support his denial of Paul Dorr’s permit. Neither could the defendant’s only other witness, Dan DeKoter.
Judge Bennett announced that he hadn’t passed judgment from the bench before, always taking it under consideration and issuing a written judgment later. But in Paul Dorr’s case he ruled for the first time, from the bench, on behalf of Dorr.
To minimize any harm to the Osceola County taxpayers, Dorr waived any claim for compensatory or punitive damages prior to the trial. In his ruling, Judge Bennett also announced, “If I had the legal authority I would order punitive damages be paid as well.”

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:18am

Judge Bennett also announced that if the law permits he may order Sheriff Weber to a take a remedial class in the 1st Amendment.
Attorney Vince Fahnlander stated, “The judgment reinforces that the First Amendment will protect those voices that speak out against the government, and will not tolerate retaliation for speaking out on opinions against governmental authority.”
The Dorrs were represented by attorneys Bill Mohrman and Vince Fahnlander of the Minneapolis law firm Mohrman & Kaardal, P.A.
-30¬
4100 City Center, 33 S. 6th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402 | 612.341.1074 | support@mklaw.com

anonymous - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 8:28am

File charges against Paul Markowski! File charges against the Mayor! City employees, wake up, they are stealing directly from you. What is wrong with your city attorney...... oh yes, he is a part of this also. Remember that. Report this gross negligence when it happens, but skip the local chain-of-command, they are almost all involved. Go larger and do your civic duty. It is time the "haves" and not the "have not's" sacrifice.

hunter4766 - Wednesday, June 23 2010 at 12:27pm

We do not have the benefit of a judge Bennett.

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 29 2010 at 1:41pm

Another good website/article that speaks to Government handouts and waste...The site is sorted on Valley County...Enjoy!!!!

top_recips.php

OrdFF - Tuesday, June 29 2010 at 1:42pm

Forgot the link for the last 15 years.... Welcome to the Million Dollar Club!

top_recips.php

rock - Sunday, July 4 2010 at 10:15am

The city of Ord property owners have or will be receiving a letter prompted by the Ord Rural Fire District. The letter is self-explanatory as to how a $21,500 short fall has come about to the fire district. It is my understanding the short fall will be for one tax year, presuming the oversight will be corrected in subsequent tax years. I would encourage, as the letter suggests that we, the city of Ord property owners voluntarily pay what would have and should have been added to our tax statements. The cost is very minimal on a yearly basis, considering the service the volunteers provide to us. It is priceless. Additionally, donations to the Ord Rural Fire Department directly would help tremendously.

Have a happy and safe 4th of July.

hunter4766 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 11:18am

The letter in question indicates that a roll will be kept of those citizens who happily contribute additional monies to the tax man, and that this roll will be distributed. I am concerned about this invasion of privacy. If I would hiccup, like Rock, and cough up extra tax money to fill the coffers of these insane money grabbing power throttling small town gangsters, I would be signing up for the 'easy mark' list. don't tell me that the city can't cut $20 g from its budget.

newbie34 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 2:02pm

I'm with Rock on this one. It takes guts to admit you made a mistake, and even bigger guts to ask for help. I certainly don't want the fire department to run out of funds on their way to fight a fire at my house.

On another note, does your head get sweaty inside your foil hat, hunter?

hunter4766 - Monday, July 5 2010 at 4:42pm

It takes no guts to ask for more money than you need.
And when one asks for help when they have more than enough, that is chutzpah.
Did anyone ask Newbie if his feet get sweaty inside his jack boots?

To comment you must be logged in.

All comments are property of their respective authors. Ord Talk in no way assumes responsibility for or endorsement of information supplied by third-party users of this site. We reserve the right to delete or edit any comment at our discretion.